Why Trump Picked a Science Adviser Who Isn’t a Scientist

In an unconventional move, former President Donald Trump appointed Kelvin Droegemeier, a meteorologist with expertise in weather and climate, as his top science adviser—a decision that sparked debate within the scientific community. Unlike previous science advisers who often held broader scientific credentials in physics, biology, or engineering, Droegemeier's background was primarily in atmospheric sciences.

Trump’s decision reflected a broader pattern within his administration, which often prioritized deregulation and industry-friendly policies over traditional scientific expertise. While Droegemeier was a respected figure in meteorology and had served as vice president for research at the University of Oklahoma, critics argued that he lacked the multidisciplinary experience needed to address complex scientific challenges, such as pandemics, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology.

Supporters, however, contended that Droegemeier's administrative background and experience in government science policy made him a pragmatic choice. He had previously served on the National Science Board and was known for advocating increased federal funding for scientific research. His appointment was seen as a compromise between the scientific community and an administration often criticized for dismissing expert advice on issues like climate change and environmental policy.

Ultimately, Trump’s choice underscored his administration’s broader approach to science—favoring advisers with regulatory and administrative expertise rather than deep scientific backgrounds. While Droegemeier was well-respected in his field, his role was limited, and his tenure was marked by challenges in bridging the gap between scientific consensus and political priorities.